Key Updates for Economic Nexus
Virginia recently adopted economic nexus thresholds for sales and use tax collection purposes, while North Dakota and Washington amended their existing rules. Virginia adopted South Dakota’s thresholds of $100,000 or 200 transactions, which were the subject of the U.S. Supreme Court’s Wayfair decision. North Dakota and Washington amended their statutes to remove the 200-separate-transactions test. Other states simply codified their existing regulations or administrative guidance.
On March 26, 2019, Virginia enacted H.B. 1722. Effective July 1, 2019, the new law requires remote sellers to register and collect sales tax if they exceed Virginia’s economic thresholds. It amends the definition of a “dealer,” under Code of Virginia Section 58.1-612(C). Beginning on July 1, 2019, a remote seller will be required to register and collect sales tax if it meets either of the following two tests:
- If the seller receives more than $100,000 in gross revenue from retail sales in Virginia in the previous or current calendar year.
- If the seller engages in 200 or more separate retail sales transactions in Virginia in the previous or current calendar year.
Unlike other states, Virginia included an aggregation method in calculating whether the remote seller exceeds the threshold. In determining the amount of gross receipts or the total number of retail sales transactions, the sales made by all “commonly controlled persons” must be aggregated. Code of Virginia Section 58.1-612(D) defines a “commonly controlled person” as any person that is a member of the same controlled group of corporations, as defined under IRC Section 1563(a). This is a major difference from other states.
The law also established the same economic nexus thresholds for “marketplace facilitators” and “marketplace sellers.” Under the new law, a marketplace facilitator is the dealer that is required to collect the sales tax, while marketplace sellers are relieved of collection duties. However, the marketplace facilitator may obtain a waiver from the Virginia Department of Taxation by showing that all of its marketplace sellers are properly registered and collecting sales and use taxes. If the marketplace facilitator obtains a waiver, then it will be relieved from collecting sales tax on behalf of its marketplace sellers.
North Dakota – 200 Separate Transaction Test Eliminated
On March 6, 2019, North Dakota enacted S.B. 2191, effective for tax years beginning after December 31, 2018. The bill amends N.D. Cent. Code Section 57-39.2-02.2 by removing the test of whether a seller sold tangible personal property (TPP) in more than 200 separate transactions. The only test that remains is whether the seller’s gross sales from the sale of TPP and other taxable items delivered into North Dakota exceed $100,000 in the previous calendar year, or the current calendar year.
The $100,000-only threshold under S.B. 2191 is effective beginning January 1, 2019. Consequently, if a remote seller exceeded the 200-separate-transactions test under the previous law, which was effective from October 1, 2018, through December 31, 2018, then it would still have established economic nexus for that period.
Washington – 200 Separate Transaction Test Eliminated
Similarly, on March 14, 2019, Washington enacted S.B. 5581. The bill became effective the same day. Like North Dakota, Washington’s bill eliminated the 200-transactions test from its economic nexus provisions. Effective March 14, 2019, through December 31, 2019, a “remote seller” is relieved of its collection responsibilities if the obligation arose solely from exceeding the 200-transactions test. Effective January 1, 2020, the only bright-line economic nexus test that remains when calculating “substantial nexus” for “sellers” is whether the business has more than $100,000 of cumulative gross receipts in Washington.
Also, like North Dakota, if a remote seller exceeded the 200-transactions test under the previous law, which was effective from October 1, 2018, through March 14, 2019, then that remote seller may still have established economic nexus for that period.
Apart from amending its “substantial nexus” thresholds, the bill also did the following:
- Eliminated click-through nexus.
- Beginning on July 1, 2019, the bill also eliminates the notice and reporting requirements that were created under the 2017 marketplace fairness laws.
- The definition of “seller” was amended to include “marketplace facilitators” and “marketplace sellers.”
- When calculating whether a marketplace facilitator meets the $100,000 gross receipts threshold, the marketplace facilitator must include its own receipts, as well as gross receipts from all marketplace sellers through the marketplace facilitator’s marketplace.
- Beginning on October 1, 2018, marketplace facilitators must collect and remit sales tax if they exceed the economic nexus thresholds, regardless of whether the marketplace seller also has a collection responsibility. And, beginning January 1, 2020, the collection obligations of marketplace facilitators also applies to other taxes and fees imposed on a retail sale made or facilitated by the marketplace facilitator.
- Finally, beginning on January 1, 2020, the bill also amended the economic nexus threshold for the B&O tax by lowering it from $267,000 to match that of sales tax at $100,000 gross receipts. The bill also eliminated the property and payroll factors for purposes of B&O tax apportionment.
Other States’ Legislative Updates Related to Economic Nexus for Remote Sellers
- Nebraska – On March 21, 2019, Nebraska enacted Legislative Bill 284, which codified its economic nexus thresholds for remote sellers of $100,000 or 200 separate transactions. Nebraska’s registration and collection responsibilities are effective April 1, 2019.
- North Carolina – On March 20, 2019, North Carolina enacted S.B. No. 56, which codified its remote seller thresholds of $100,000 or 200 transactions, as established in Directive No. SD-18-6.
- Kansas – On March 25, 2019, Governor Kelly vetoed S.B. 22, which would have adopted economic nexus thresholds for remote sellers, among other things.
- Rhode Island – On March 29, 2019, Rhode Island enacted S.B. 251 Sub A, which updated its economic nexus laws to include “marketplace facilitators,” with thresholds of $100,000 or 200 separate transactions. It also eliminates the option of remote sellers to comply with notice and reporting requirements, in lieu of sales tax collection.
Contact a member of MFA’s State and Local Tax Practice to answer all your Wayfair questions.
Material discussed in this communication is meant to provide general information and should not be acted on without obtaining professional advice tailored to you or your company’s individual and specific needs. Any tax advice contained in this communication (including any attachments) is not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used by any person or entity, for the purpose of (i) avoiding penalties that may be imposed on any taxpayer or (ii) promoting, marketing or recommending to another party any transaction or matter addressed herein. This information is for general guidance only and is not a substitute for professional advice.
The information contained herein should not be construed as personalized investment advice. Investment in securities involves the risk of loss, and past performance is no guarantee of future results. There is no guarantee that the views and opinions expressed in this document will come to pass. Historical performance results for investment indexes and/or categories generally do not reflect the deduction of transaction and/or custodial charges or the deduction of an investment-management fee, the incurrence of which would have the effect of decreasing historical performance results. There can be no assurances that your portfolio will match or outperform any particular benchmark.
Information presented was obtained from sources deemed qualified and reliable; however, MFA makes no representations as to accuracy, completeness, suitability, or validity of any information within this communication and will not be liable for any errors, omissions, or delays in this information or any losses, injuries, or damages arising from its display or use. Any forward-looking statements are believed to be reasonable; however, MFA gives no assurance that such expectations will prove to be correct.