FASB Proposes to Defer Effective Dates of Major New Accounting Standards
The Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) has proposed an ASU that would amend the effective dates of certain major accounting standards that are not yet effective for some or all entities, specifically:
The proposed ASU reflects a new FASB viewpoint about effective dates that would stagger the implementation dates of new major accounting standards for larger public entities compared to all other entities, including smaller public companies, private companies, employee benefit plans, and nonprofit organizations. Going forward, a new standard would first be effective for larger public companies. All other entities would generally have two additional years to implement, although the FASB would maintain the discretion to establish effective dates that vary from this guideline, as needed.
The FASB is proposing to defer effective dates that vary by accounting standard and company type, adopting a two-bucket approach for staggering the effective dates of these standards. The two buckets would include:
- Bucket One: SEC Filers (GAAP definition), excluding smaller reporting companies (SRCs) as currently defined by the SEC.
- Bucket Two: All Other Entities, including:
- Private companies,
- All nonprofit organizations, including nonprofit entities that have issued, or are conduit bond obligors for, securities that are traded, listed, or quoted on an exchange or an over-the-counter market,
- Employee benefit plans, including those that file financial statements with the SEC.
The proposed effective dates for CECL, Leases, and Hedging are as follows. Note that early adoption would continue to be permitted.
Effective Dates (Calendar Year-End Companies) utilizing the new two-bucket approach:
|SEC Filers excluding SRCs||All Other Entities|
|CECL||January 2020||January 2023*|
|Public Business Entities||All Other Entities|
|Leases||January 2019||January 2021*|
|Hedging||January 2019||January 2021*|
A public entity would determine its effective date based on its most recent SRC determination at the date the final ASU is issued. For example, if the final ASU on deferral of effective dates is issued in Q4, 2019, a calendar year-end entity would utilize its SRC status as of June 30, 2019. The effective date for that entity would not change even if the entity subsequently loses its SRC status.
The FASB is looking for feedback on the proposed effective dates and its two-bucket approach by September 16, 2019.
On the Horizon
The FASB is continuing to evaluate possible amendments for the insurance standard and will issue a separate proposed Update. For future major standards only, the FASB also tentatively decided in July to align the annual and interim transition requirements for all entities in Bucket Two. All entities in Bucket Two, including SRCs, would benefit from an additional year to apply amendments to their interim financial statements, consistent with current private companies transition requirements. As part of the proposed ASU, the FASB is requesting feedback on this approach to interim period effective dates for entities in Bucket Two.
If you have questions regarding these proposed changes, please reach out to a member of our Technical Accounting Team.
*Represents a change in the effective date
 ASC 326 Financial Instruments – Credit Losses
 ASC 842 Leases
 ASC 815 Derivatives and Hedging
 Including interim periods beginning January 2022.
 For Leases and Hedging, Bucket One remains all PBEs because these standards are currently effective for these entities.
 Also includes certain Employee Benefit Plans and NFP Conduit Bond Obligors that file or provide financial statements with or to the SEC.
 Including interim periods beginning January 2022.
Material discussed in this communication is meant to provide general information and should not be acted on without obtaining professional advice tailored to you or your company’s individual and specific needs. Any tax advice contained in this communication (including any attachments) is not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used by any person or entity, for the purpose of (i) avoiding penalties that may be imposed on any taxpayer or (ii) promoting, marketing or recommending to another party any transaction or matter addressed herein. This information is for general guidance only and is not a substitute for professional advice.
The information contained herein should not be construed as personalized investment advice. Investment in securities involves the risk of loss, and past performance is no guarantee of future results. There is no guarantee that the views and opinions expressed in this document will come to pass. Historical performance results for investment indexes and/or categories generally do not reflect the deduction of transaction and/or custodial charges or the deduction of an investment-management fee, the incurrence of which would have the effect of decreasing historical performance results. There can be no assurances that your portfolio will match or outperform any particular benchmark.
Information presented was obtained from sources deemed qualified and reliable; however, MFA makes no representations as to accuracy, completeness, suitability, or validity of any information within this communication and will not be liable for any errors, omissions, or delays in this information or any losses, injuries, or damages arising from its display or use. Any forward-looking statements are believed to be reasonable; however, MFA gives no assurance that such expectations will prove to be correct.