FASB Clarifies Accounting for Service Concession Arrangements
The FASB recently issued ASU 2017-10 to clarify that the grantor in a service concession arrangement is the operating entity’s customer for purposes of revenue recognition. The ASU is available here, and becomes effective generally in conjunction with an entity’s adoption of the new revenue standard in Topic 606.
Topic 853 defines a service concession arrangement as being between a public–sector grantor and an operating entity, whereby the operating entity operates the grantor’s infrastructure (e.g., airports, roads, bridges, tunnels, prisons, hospitals) for a specified period of time. For such arrangements within the scope of Topic 853, the operating entity should not account for the infrastructure as a lease or as property, plant, and equipment, but should apply other relevant guidance. For example, an operating entity should account for revenue relating to construction, upgrade, or operation services in accordance with the revenue recognition guidance. However, Topic 853 currently does not address how an operating entity should determine its customer in such an arrangement, for example, the owner of a toll road or the drivers who use it. This omission has led to diversity in practice.
ASU 2017-10 amends Topic 853 to clarify that when applying Topic 606, an operating entity in a service concession arrangement should consider the grantor to be its customer for the services it provides in all cases. This includes the construction of the infrastructure, if any, as well as operating services.
The FASB ultimately concluded the operating entity is acting as the grantor’s service provider to operate and maintain the infrastructure, which is controlled by the grantor, and the only parties to the executed service concession arrangement are the grantor and the operating entity.
Effective Date and Transition
The effective date of ASU 2017-10 depends on whether an entity has already adopted Topic 606:
- For an entity that has not adopted Topic 606 before the issuance of this ASU, the effective date and transition requirements for the amendments generally are the same as the effective date and transition requirements for Topic 606. An entity may apply this ASU earlier, including within an interim period, even though the entity has not yet adopted Topic 606, but specific transition requirements apply.
- For an entity that has adopted Topic 606 before the issuance of this ASU, the effective date of the amendments is as follows:
- For a public business entity the amendments are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within those fiscal years.
- For all other entities, the amendments are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, and interim periods within fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019.
For questions related to matters discussed above, please contact us.
 Scope of Modification Accounting
 Service Concession Arrangements
 Revenue from Contracts with Customers
 Including a not-for-profit entity that has issued, or is a conduit bond obligor for, securities that are traded, listed, or quoted on an exchange or an over-the-counter market, and an employee benefit plan that files or furnishes financial statements with or to the Securities and Exchange Commission.
Material discussed in this communication is meant to provide general information and should not be acted on without obtaining professional advice tailored to you or your company’s individual and specific needs. Any tax advice contained in this communication (including any attachments) is not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used by any person or entity, for the purpose of (i) avoiding penalties that may be imposed on any taxpayer or (ii) promoting, marketing or recommending to another party any transaction or matter addressed herein. This information is for general guidance only and is not a substitute for professional advice.
The information contained herein should not be construed as personalized investment advice. Investment in securities involves the risk of loss, and past performance is no guarantee of future results. There is no guarantee that the views and opinions expressed in this document will come to pass. Historical performance results for investment indexes and/or categories generally do not reflect the deduction of transaction and/or custodial charges or the deduction of an investment-management fee, the incurrence of which would have the effect of decreasing historical performance results. There can be no assurances that your portfolio will match or outperform any particular benchmark.
Information presented was obtained from sources deemed qualified and reliable; however, MFA makes no representations as to accuracy, completeness, suitability, or validity of any information within this communication and will not be liable for any errors, omissions, or delays in this information or any losses, injuries, or damages arising from its display or use. Any forward-looking statements are believed to be reasonable; however, MFA gives no assurance that such expectations will prove to be correct.