Could This Be the End of Physical Presence Nexus?
On April 17, 2018, the Supreme Court of the United States heard oral arguments in South Dakota v. Wayfair, et al. South Dakota is challenging, and attempting to have overturned, the physical presence nexus standard for the collection of sales and use taxes that was re-affirmed 26 years ago in Quill Corp. v. North Dakota. South Dakota enacted its economic presence nexus statute for sales and use tax collection on March 22, 2016. The effective date of the legislation is stayed, pending the resolution of the Wayfair case. Under the statute, a remote seller is required to collect and remit sales tax if: (1) the seller’s South Dakota sales exceed $100,000; or (2) the seller has more than 200 separate sales transactions into South Dakota.
While the matter is ongoing, the pure fact that the court is willing to hear this case makes it worthwhile for anyone doing business across state lines to pay attention – and not just in South Dakota.
- During oral arguments, the Justices appeared focused on: whether congressional legislation is still the better approach to moving on from the physical presence nexus standard; the retroactive effect of a decision overruling Quill; what is a constitutional minimal economic threshold; and the impact on, including costs of compliance for, small businesses.
- If the Court overturns Quill, it is likely that more states will be encouraged to enact similar sales/use tax economic nexus legislation.
- If the Court upholds Quill, it is likely that states will become even more aggressive in pushing the envelope of physical presence nexus. Affiliate, attributional, “click-through,” software and “cookie” nexus will likely become even greater focus areas for states.
- Depending on the outcome of the Wayfair decision, federal legislation that has been pending in the U.S. Congress for some time could get a boost.
The current physical presence nexus means a state can generally only impose sales tax on a company if that company has some type of physical presence in a state. Physical presence can include, but not be limited to, resident employees working from their homes or in rented offices, business development activities, relationship management activities, solicitation and the performances of services (e.g., training, implementation, repairs, etc.). Moving from a physical presence nexus to an economic nexus means companies who only have a physical presence in Massachusetts may be required to collect and remit sales taxes in every state where they have sales.
If you have questions about how your company handles State and Local Tax or how the outcome of this court decision could affect your company, please connect with us.
|More Insights on State and Local Tax|
Material discussed in this communication is meant to provide general information and should not be acted on without obtaining professional advice tailored to you or your company’s individual and specific needs. Any tax advice contained in this communication (including any attachments) is not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used by any person or entity, for the purpose of (i) avoiding penalties that may be imposed on any taxpayer or (ii) promoting, marketing or recommending to another party any transaction or matter addressed herein. This information is for general guidance only and is not a substitute for professional advice.
The information contained herein should not be construed as personalized investment advice. Investment in securities involves the risk of loss, and past performance is no guarantee of future results. There is no guarantee that the views and opinions expressed in this document will come to pass. Historical performance results for investment indexes and/or categories generally do not reflect the deduction of transaction and/or custodial charges or the deduction of an investment-management fee, the incurrence of which would have the effect of decreasing historical performance results. There can be no assurances that your portfolio will match or outperform any particular benchmark.
Information presented was obtained from sources deemed qualified and reliable; however, MFA makes no representations as to accuracy, completeness, suitability, or validity of any information within this communication and will not be liable for any errors, omissions, or delays in this information or any losses, injuries, or damages arising from its display or use. Any forward-looking statements are believed to be reasonable; however, MFA gives no assurance that such expectations will prove to be correct.